linux-kernel - Re: n900 in next-20170901

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170925145437.GG4394@atomide.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:54:37 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901

* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [170925 01:06]:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [170914 23:55]:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:31:27AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Yes I disabled CONFIG_HIGHMEM and n900 boots. To disable it,
> > > > you need to remove it from arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig that
> > > > selects it if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS_TYPICAL is selected.
> > > 
> > > Okay. Problem would be related to address traslation. I'd like to
> > > check address traslation more. Could you apply following patch and
> > > test it? And, please send me the dmesg log and your kernel config.
> > > Please test this with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL = n and CONFIG_CMA_DEBUG=y and
> > > CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y and with kernel bootparam 'ignore_loglevel'.
> > > 
> > > It would be really appreciate if you send me two logs for before/after
> > > commit 9caf25f996e8.
> > 
> > Sorry for the delays, I finally got around testing this for you.
> 
> No problem! I really appreciate your help!
> 
> > Compile with your patch failed for modules with __virt_to_phys_debug
> > being undefined so I added EXPORT_SYMBOL there. I also enabled DEBUG_LL
> > and EARLYPRINTK to get output.
> > 
> > Below is dmesg output for 9caf25f996e8 + your patch. I'll send you
> > the full logs separately.
> 
> Hmm...there is only one caller for the CMA memory, that is, atomic_pool_init().
> Could you test one more time with 9caf25f996e8 + following patch?  I'd like to
> know the actual user for the CMA memory.

Hmm not getting any stack with that patch after manually applying
it because of tabs to spaces mangling.

Regards,

Tony


> -------------------------->8------------------------
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 519c294..c68f34a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,8 @@ static void *__alloc_from_pool(size_t size, struct page **ret_page)
>                 ptr = (void *)val;
>         }
>  
> +       dump_stack();
> +
>         return ptr;
>  }
>