[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925145720.GM4311@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:57:20 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM/vmx: enable lbr for the guest
> +static void auto_switch_lbr_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct perf_lbr_stack lbr_stack;
> +
> + perf_get_lbr_stack(&lbr_stack);
> +
> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_LBR_SELECT, 0, 0);
> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, lbr_stack.lbr_tos, 0, 0);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < lbr_stack.lbr_nr; i++) {
> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, lbr_stack.lbr_from + i, 0, 0);
> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, lbr_stack.lbr_to + i, 0, 0);
> + if (lbr_stack.lbr_info)
> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, lbr_stack.lbr_info + i, 0,
> + 0);
> + }
That will be really expensive and add a lot of overhead to every entry/exit.
perf can already context switch the LBRs on task context switch. With that
you can just switch LBR_SELECT, which is *much* cheaper because there
are far less context switches than exit/entries.
It implies that when KVM is running it needs to prevent perf from enabling
LBRs in the context of KVM, but that should be straight forward.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists