[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925164403.2gxyec7ehvw3aypr@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:44:03 -0700
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
kernel-team@...com, axboe@...nel.dk, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] block: make loop block device cgroup aware
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
>
> Hi,
>
> The IO dispatched to under layer disk by loop block device isn't cloned from
> original bio, so the IO loses cgroup information of original bio. These IO
> escapes from cgroup control. The patches try to address this issue. The idea is
> quite generic, but we currently only make it work for blkcg.
Ping! how do we proceed with this patch set?
Thanks,
Shaohua
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
>
> V2->V3:
> - Make the API more robust pointed out by Tejun
>
> V1->V2:
> - Address a couple of issues pointed out by Tejun
>
>
> Shaohua Li (4):
> kthread: add a mechanism to store cgroup info
> blkcg: delete unused APIs
> block: make blkcg aware of kthread stored original cgroup info
> block/loop: make loop cgroup aware
>
> block/bio.c | 31 ----------------------
> drivers/block/loop.c | 13 +++++++++
> drivers/block/loop.h | 1 +
> include/linux/bio.h | 2 --
> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 25 +++++-------------
> include/linux/kthread.h | 11 ++++++++
> kernel/kthread.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 7 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists