[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925173651.zyof5olbas52wb2q@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:36:51 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/25/17 09:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why is that not just an || COMPILE_TEST dependency then? The dependency
> > you're trying to introduce is weird and confusing, we shouldn't be
> > having to do things like that.
> It already uses COMPILE_TEST:
> config SPI_SPRD_ADI
> tristate "Spreadtrum ADI controller"
> depends on ARCH_SPRD || COMPILE_TEST
> help
> ADI driver based on SPI for Spreadtrum SoCs.
> but that allows build errors when SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=y.
> As for the dependency that I am adding:
> + depends on HWSPINLOCK || HWSPINLOCK=n
> that idiom is used over and over again in Kconfig files to prevent this kind of
> build problem in loadable modules.
And what is that equivalent to in relation to COMPILE_TEST, especially
considering the situations where you'd build this without hwspinlock
support?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists