[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR12MB16004E2A92CC3FFEC6313DDBC87A0@MWHPR12MB1600.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:46:19 +0000
From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
CC: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Harsh Jain" <Harsh@...lsio.com>,
"David Woodhouse" <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: DMA error when sg->offset value is greater than PAGE_SIZE in
Intel IOMMU
| From: Raj, Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>
| Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 8:54 AM
|
| Not sure how the page->offset would end up being greater than page-size?
|
| If you have additional traces, please send them by.
|
| Is this a new driver? wondering how we didn't run into this?
According to Herbert Xu and one of our own engineers, it's actually legal
for Scatter/Gather Lists to have this. This isn't my area of expertise
though so I'm just passing that on.
I've asked our team to produce a detailed trace of the exact
Scatter/Gather Lists they're seeing and what ends up coming out of the DMA
Mappings, etc. They're in India, so I expect that they'll have this for you
by tomorrow morning.
Casey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists