[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR12MB16002A374CBB41BB201BA061C87A0@MWHPR12MB1600.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:19:21 +0000
From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Harsh Jain" <Harsh@...lsio.com>
CC: "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Werner <werner@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: DMA error when sg->offset value is greater than PAGE_SIZE in
Intel IOMMU
| From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
| Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 11:45 AM
|
| On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:01 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
| > Harsh Jain <Harsh@...lsio.com> wrote:
| > >
| > > While debugging DMA mapping error in chelsio crypto driver we
| > observed that when scatter/gather list received by driver has some
| > entry with page->offset > 4096 (PAGE_SIZE). It starts giving DMA
| > error. Without IOMMU it works fine.
| >
| > This is not a bug. The network stack can and will feed us such
| > SG lists.
|
| Hm? Under what circumstances is the offset permitted to be >
| PAGE_SIZE?
As I noted earlier, this is an area of the kernel with which I'm not super
familiar. Both Herbert Xu and our local VM Expert have said that having
Scatter/Gather Lists with Offsets greater than Page Size is not a bug ...
I'm mostly trying to help out keeping focus on this because Harsh is in
India (presumable enjoying a good night's sleep while we look at this.
Hopefully we'll have a present of a bug fix for him when he wakes up ... :-)
Casey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists