linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC V3 2/5] perf tools: lock to protect comm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:23:05 -0700
From:   kan.liang@...el.com
To:     acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        lukasz.odzioba@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC V3 2/5] perf tools: lock to protect comm_str rb tree

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

Add comm_str_lock to protect comm_str rb tree.

The lock is only needed for multithreaded code, so using mutex wrappers
provided by perf tool.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/comm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/comm.c b/tools/perf/util/comm.c
index 7bc981b..756a9c1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/comm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/comm.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <linux/refcount.h>
+#include "rwsem.h"
 
 struct comm_str {
 	char *str;
@@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ struct comm_str {
 
 /* Should perhaps be moved to struct machine */
 static struct rb_root comm_str_root;
+static struct rw_semaphore comm_str_lock = {.lock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER,};
 
 static struct comm_str *comm_str__get(struct comm_str *cs)
 {
@@ -25,7 +27,9 @@ static struct comm_str *comm_str__get(struct comm_str *cs)
 static void comm_str__put(struct comm_str *cs)
 {
 	if (cs && refcount_dec_and_test(&cs->refcnt)) {
+		down_write(&comm_str_lock);
 		rb_erase(&cs->rb_node, &comm_str_root);
+		up_write(&comm_str_lock);
 		zfree(&cs->str);
 		free(cs);
 	}
@@ -50,7 +54,8 @@ static struct comm_str *comm_str__alloc(const char *str)
 	return cs;
 }
 
-static struct comm_str *comm_str__findnew(const char *str, struct rb_root *root)
+static
+struct comm_str *__comm_str__findnew(const char *str, struct rb_root *root)
 {
 	struct rb_node **p = &root->rb_node;
 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
@@ -81,6 +86,17 @@ static struct comm_str *comm_str__findnew(const char *str, struct rb_root *root)
 	return new;
 }
 
+static struct comm_str *comm_str__findnew(const char *str, struct rb_root *root)
+{
+	struct comm_str *cs;
+
+	down_write(&comm_str_lock);
+	cs = __comm_str__findnew(str, root);
+	up_write(&comm_str_lock);
+
+	return cs;
+}
+
 struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp, bool exec)
 {
 	struct comm *comm = zalloc(sizeof(*comm));
-- 
2.5.5