[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170926063650.GE6870@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:36:50 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
> bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
> struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
>
> This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
> xfs_fs_fill_super().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague
memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different
series, wasn't it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists