[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170926071407.31719-3-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:14:06 +0200
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: trond.myklebust@...marydata.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, jlayton@...chiereds.net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] nfs_common: move locks_in_grace comment at the right place
Commit c87fb4a378f9 ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens")
made the locks_in_grace() comment be in the wrong place.
This patch move this comment just at the right place.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
---
fs/nfs_common/grace.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
index 519396967e79..c030cd618b99 100644
--- a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
+++ b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
@@ -55,13 +55,6 @@ locks_end_grace(struct lock_manager *lm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_end_grace);
-/**
- * locks_in_grace
- *
- * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them
- * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only
- * lock reclaims.
- */
static int
__state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open)
{
@@ -78,6 +71,13 @@ __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open)
return false;
}
+/**
+ * locks_in_grace
+ *
+ * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them
+ * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only
+ * lock reclaims.
+ */
int locks_in_grace(struct net *net)
{
return __state_in_grace(net, 0);
--
2.13.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists