linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:30:21 +0200
From:   Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kirill@...temov.name, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, dave@...olabs.net,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

Hi Alexei,

Le 25/09/2017 à 18:27, Alexei Starovoitov a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour
> <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any
>> feedback on this series.
>>
>> Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ?
> 
> what is the status ?

As mentioned by Andrew this lacks review and test, what about your 
Ack/Review/Tested-By ?

> We're eagerly looking forward for this set to land,
> since we have several use cases for tracing that
> will build on top of this set as discussed at Plumbers.

Unfortunately I was not able to attend Plumbers this year, but I'll be 
pleased, as well as the MM mailing readers, to get your feedback and use 
cases of this series.

Thanks,
Laurent.