linux-kernel - Re: Contribution to Linux Kernel.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <539773e0-9527-daf2-e8f7-a2aff7d257a2@partner.samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:14:39 +0200
From:   Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
To:     Javier Romero <linux.kernel.programming@...il.com>,
        Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contribution to Linux Kernel.

On 25.09.2017 21:03, Javier Romero wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Last question, it will be the same to do Kernel testing on a virtual machine, 
> or it will be better to do kernel testing over a no virtual machine?
> 
> El 24/09/17 a las 17:25, Ken Moffat escribió:
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 12:52:08PM -0300, Javier Romero wrote:
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>> Will it be better to work with linux-next Kernel for testing?
>>>
>> Yes, no, maybe.  I can't say what will work (process) for you, it
>> depends in part on what you want to test, and how flakey that is at
>> any particular time.
>>[...]

both tests will be different, because VM is not bare metal machine
and both will be valueable

Regards,
Kamil