[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8D983423E7EDF846BB3056827B8CC5D15D5C0B2E@corpmail1>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:27:29 +0000
From: "Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mporter@...nel.crashing.org" <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] constify rio_device_id
Yes, single patch makes sense.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 7:14 PM
To: Bounine, Alexandre <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; mporter@...nel.crashing.org; Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] constify rio_device_id
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:45:09 +0000 "Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com> wrote:
> Acked-by: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Please apply the patches listed below. I will forward them to you.
I'm subscribed to linux-kernel so the extra forwardings weren't needed, thanks.
I'm thinking we might as well fold all these into a single patch, save a few electrons?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists