[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709261359330.1848@nanos>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:00:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, dianders@...omium.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
tfiga@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] genirq: Support shared per_cpu_devid
interrupts
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Paul Burton wrote:
> > Up until now per_cpu_devid interrupts have not supported sharing. On
> > MIPS we have some percpu interrupts which are shared in many systems -
> > a single CPU interrupt line may be used to indicate a timer interrupt,
> > performance counter interrupt or fast debug channel interrupt. We have
> > up until now supported this with a series of hacks, wherein drivers call
> > each other's interrupt handlers & our MIPS GIC irqchip driver includes a
> > hack which configures the interrupt(s) for all CPUs. In order to allow
> > this mess to be cleaned up, this patch introduces support for shared
> > per_cpu_devid interrupts.
> >
> > The major portion of this is supporting per_cpu_devid interrupts in
> > __handle_irq_event_percpu() and then making use of this, via
> > handle_irq_event_percpu(), from handler_percpu_devif_irq() to invoke the
> > handler for all actions associated with the shared interrupt. This does
> > have a few side effects worth noting:
> >
> > - per_cpu_devid interrupts will now add to the entropy pool via
> > add_interrupt_randomness(), where they previously did not.
> >
> > - per_cpu_devid interrupts will record timings when IRQS_TIMINGS is
> > set, via record_irq_time(), where they previously did not.
> >
> > - per_cpu_devid interrupts will handle an IRQ_WAKE_THREAD return from
> > their handlers to wake a thread, where they previously did not.
>
> That's broken because it lacks the magic synchronization which is described
> in the comment in __irq_wake_thread().
Aside of that to make that work at all would require per cpu threads and
not a single systemwide thread.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists