[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9412dba0-8e52-3361-f51d-0a8c70364d7f@chelsio.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:34:54 +0530
From: Harsh Jain <Harsh@...lsio.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
Subject: Re: DMA error when sg->offset value is greater than PAGE_SIZE in
Intel IOMMU
On 26-09-2017 01:41, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com> wrote:
>> | From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> | Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 12:31 PM
>> | ...
>> | IIUC it looks like this has been broken ever since commit e1605495c716
>> | "intel-iommu: Introduce domain_sg_mapping() to speed up
>> | intel_map_sg()". I.e. it looks like the calculation for pte_val should
>> | be:
>> |
>> | pteval = (page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset) | prot;
>>
>> Hhmmm, shouldn't that be:
>>
>> pteval = (page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) + (sg->offset>>PAGE_SHIFT)) | prot;
> Yes, I think you're right. We do want to mask off the page-unaligned
> portion of sg->offset.
Tried changing above line in "__domain_mapping" but didn't help.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists