[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <59C9B93D.2080109@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:19:41 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] extcon: gpio: Request reasonable interrupts
Hi Linus,
On 2017년 09월 24일 23:56, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The only thing that makes sense is to request a falling edge interrupt
> if the line is active low and a rising edge interrupt if the line is
> active high, so just do that and get rid of the assignment from
> platform data. The GPIO descriptor knows if the line is active high
> or low.
>
> Also make irq a local variable in probe(), it's not used anywhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> index 86f3ec6d6014..6d9cb4ed11c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> @@ -30,26 +30,22 @@
> /**
> * struct gpio_extcon_data - A simple GPIO-controlled extcon device state container.
> * @edev: Extcon device.
> - * @irq: Interrupt line for the external connector.
> * @work: Work fired by the interrupt.
> * @debounce_jiffies: Number of jiffies to wait for the GPIO to stabilize, from the debounce
> * value.
> * @gpiod: GPIO descriptor for this external connector.
> * @extcon_id: The unique id of specific external connector.
> * @debounce: Debounce time for GPIO IRQ in ms.
> - * @irq_flags: IRQ Flags (e.g., IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW).
> * @check_on_resume: Boolean describing whether to check the state of gpio
> * while resuming from sleep.
> */
> struct gpio_extcon_data {
> struct extcon_dev *edev;
> - int irq;
> struct delayed_work work;
> unsigned long debounce_jiffies;
> struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
> unsigned int extcon_id;
> unsigned long debounce;
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
> bool check_on_resume;
> };
>
> @@ -77,21 +73,34 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct gpio_extcon_data *data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + unsigned long irq_flags;
> + int irq;
> int ret;
>
> data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct gpio_extcon_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (!data->irq_flags || data->extcon_id > EXTCON_NONE)
> + if (data->extcon_id > EXTCON_NONE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "extcon", GPIOD_IN);
> if (IS_ERR(data->gpiod))
> return PTR_ERR(data->gpiod);
> - data->irq = gpiod_to_irq(data->gpiod);
> - if (data->irq <= 0)
> - return data->irq;
> + irq = gpiod_to_irq(data->gpiod);
> + if (irq <= 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> + /*
> + * It is unlikely that this is an acknowledged interrupt that goes
> + * away after handling, what we are looking for are falling edges
> + * if the signal is active low, and rising edges if the signal is
> + * active high.
> + */
> + if (gpiod_is_active_low(data->gpiod))
> + irq_flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
> + else
> + irq_flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING;
>
> /* Allocate the memory of extcon devie and register extcon device */
> data->edev = devm_extcon_dev_allocate(dev, &data->extcon_id);
> @@ -110,8 +119,8 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * Request the interrupt of gpio to detect whether external connector
> * is attached or detached.
> */
> - ret = devm_request_any_context_irq(dev, data->irq,
> - gpio_irq_handler, data->irq_flags,
> + ret = devm_request_any_context_irq(dev, irq,
> + gpio_irq_handler, irq_flags,
> pdev->name, data);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists