[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170926201535.x4lkwck4h2a2itbt@smitten>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:15:35 -0600
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Chris Salls <chrissalls5@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix the usage of get/put_seccomp_filter() in
seccomp_get_filter()
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 05:22:29PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/21, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Can you resend the two patches; I can send the backport to -stable manually...
>
> Not sure I understand... Do you mean this fix + untested "introduce get_nth_filter()" ?
Just want to make sure this doesn't get lost in the shuffle. If I
resend just Oleg's patch with the added __get_secomp_filter() instead
of open coded refcount, will that work for you Kees?
We can worry about the get_nth_filter implementation with the
PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_METADATA series later.
Cheers,
Tycho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists