lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170926202508.GQ15970@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:25:08 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jork Loeser <jloeser@...rosoft.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Bail early in acpi_pci_add_bus() if there is
 no ACPI handle

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hyper-V instances support PCI pass-through which is implemented through
> PV pci-hyperv driver. When a device is passed through a new root PCI bus
> is created in the guest. The bus sits on top of VMBus and has no
> associated information in ACPI. acpi_pci_add_bus() in this case proceeds
> all the way to acpi_evaluate_dsm() with reports
> 
>     ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001)
> 
> While acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and acpiphp_enumerate_slots() are protected
> against ACPI_HANDLE() being NULL and do nothing acpi_evaluate_dsm() is not
> and gives us the error. It seems the correct fix is to not do anything in
> acpi_pci_add_bus() in such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

Applied to pci/acpi for v4.15, thanks!

Rafael, let me know if you have any objections or if you'd rather take
it yourself.

> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index a8da543b3814..4708eb9df71b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  	union acpi_object *obj;
>  	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
>  
> -	if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge)
> +	if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge || !ACPI_HANDLE(bus->bridge))
>  		return;
>  
>  	acpi_pci_slot_enumerate(bus);
> -- 
> 2.13.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ