[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8Xd8RQ4s1xMsSuxHgQRiHS6vDtxVTAxu8Ba3J3it45MC5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:13:30 +1000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: aspeed: Add platform driver and register PLLs
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 13:56 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * Memory controller (M-PLL) PLL. This clock is configured by the
>> + * bootloader, and is exposed to Linux as a read-only clock rate.
>> + */
>> + regmap_read(map, ASPEED_MPLL_PARAM, &val);
>> + aspeed_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_MPLL] = aspeed_calc_pll("mpll", val);
>
> IIRC the calculation in aspeed_calc_pll() is appropriate for the AST2500, but
> not the AST2400.
Ah ha. I knew there was a reason why I created an ast2400_calc_pll. I
will add it back in in the previous patch so we can use it here.
>> + /* Video Engine (ECLK) mux and clock divider */
>> + hw = clk_hw_register_mux(NULL, "eclk_mux",
>> + eclk_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(eclk_parents), 0,
>> + scu_base + ASPEED_CLK_SELECTION, 2, 2,
>> + 0, &aspeed_clk_lock);
>> + aspeed_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_ECLK_MUX] = hw;
>> + hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(NULL, "eclk", "eclk_mux", 0,
>> + scu_base + ASPEED_CLK_SELECTION, 20, 3, 0,
>
> On the AST2500 it looks like this should start at bit 28 for 3 bits, not bit
Good catch. Fixed in v3.
> 20. Separately, I'm not sure how to interpret the AST2400 datasheet here -
> maybe it's similar but with different wording ("clock slow down" rather than
> "divisor"?).
>
>> + div_table,
>
> This doesn't seem to be correct. There's the problem of 0b000 and 0b001 mapping
> the same value of 2 for the AST2500, whose table then increments in steps of 1.
> The AST2400 mapping on the otherhand is multiples of 2 starting at 2, with no
> inconsistency for 0b000 vs 0b001.
Yep, we do use a different table for ast2400 vs ast2500. See
ast2400_div_table vs ast2500_div_table.
>
>> + &aspeed_clk_lock);
>> + aspeed_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_ECLK] = hw;
>> +
>> + /* P-Bus (BCLK) clock divider */
>> + hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(NULL, "bclk", "hpll", 0,
>> + scu_base + ASPEED_CLK_SELECTION, 0, 2, 0,
>
> Bit 0 in SCU08 is a 1-bit field "CPU/AHB clock dynamic slow down enable". BCLK
> is actually in SCU*D*8, but (perhaps confusingly) documented immediately below
> SCU*0*8.
Good catch. Fixed in v3.
Cheers,
Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists