[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1506497645.30138.37.camel@aj.id.au>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:04:05 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: aspeed: Add platform driver and register
PLLs
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 16:13 +1000, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > > + div_table,
> >
> > This doesn't seem to be correct. There's the problem of 0b000 and 0b001 mapping
> > the same value of 2 for the AST2500, whose table then increments in steps of 1.
> > The AST2400 mapping on the otherhand is multiples of 2 starting at 2, with no
> > inconsistency for 0b000 vs 0b001.
>
> Yep, we do use a different table for ast2400 vs ast2500. See
> ast2400_div_table vs ast2500_div_table.
Yep, but for the AST2500 this is a different table again to what you've
already defined (for the AST2500). However, for the AST2400 the table
looks the same as the other AST2400 tables.
Cheers,
Andrew
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists