[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170927074835.37m4dclmew5ecli2@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:48:35 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, swap: Make VMA based swap readahead configurable
On Wed 27-09-17 14:04:01, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 03:21:29PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 21-09-17 09:33:10, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > > From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> > >
> > > This patch adds a new Kconfig option VMA_SWAP_READAHEAD and wraps VMA
> > > based swap readahead code inside #ifdef CONFIG_VMA_SWAP_READAHEAD/#endif.
> > > This is more friendly for tiny kernels.
> >
> > How (much)?
> >
> > > And as pointed to by Minchan
> > > Kim, give people who want to disable the swap readahead an opportunity
> > > to notice the changes to the swap readahead algorithm and the
> > > corresponding knobs.
> >
> > Why would anyone want that?
> >
> > Please note that adding new config options make the already complicated
> > config space even more problematic so there should be a good reason to
> > add one. Please make sure your justification is clear on why this is
> > worth the future maintenance and configurability burden.
>
> The problem is users have disabled swap readahead by echo 0 > /proc/sys/
> vm/page-cluster are regressed by this new interface /sys/kernel/mm/swap/
> vma_ra_max_order. Because for disabling readahead completely, they should
> disable vma_ra_max_order as well as page-cluster from now on.
>
> So, goal of new config to notice new feature to admins so they can be aware
> of new konb vma_ra_max_order as well as page-cluster.
> I canont think other better idea to preventing such regression.
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/%3C20170913014019.GB29422@bbox%3E
So, how are you going to configure this when you do not know whether
zram will be used? In other words what should e.g. distribution set this
to?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists