linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: new helper functions to free the caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1506518920-18571-8-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:28:37 +0200
From:   Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     eric.auger.pro@...il.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        marc.zyngier@....com, cdall@...aro.org, peter.maydell@...aro.org,
        andre.przywara@....com, wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com
Cc:     wu.wubin@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: new helper functions to free the caches

From: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>

We create 2 new functions that frees the device and
collection lists. this is currently called by vgic_its_destroy()
and we will add other callers in subsequent patches.

We also remove the check on its->device_list.next as it looks
unnecessary:

The kvm device is removed by kvm_destroy_devices which loops on
all the devices added to kvm->devices. kvm_ioctl_create_device
only adds the device to kvm_devices once the lists have been
initialized (in vgic_create_its).

We also move vgic_its_free_device to prepare for new callers.

Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

---
[Eric] removed its->device_list.next which is not needed as
pointed out by Wanghaibin. Reword the commit message
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 9e6b556..0df6d5f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -611,6 +611,45 @@ static void its_free_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
 	kfree(ite);
 }
 
+static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *dev)
+{
+	struct its_ite *ite, *tmp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(ite, tmp, &dev->itt_head, ite_list)
+		its_free_ite(kvm, ite);
+	list_del(&dev->dev_list);
+	kfree(dev);
+}
+
+static void vgic_its_free_device_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
+{
+	struct list_head *cur, *temp;
+
+	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
+	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list) {
+		struct its_device *dev;
+
+		dev = list_entry(cur, struct its_device, dev_list);
+		vgic_its_free_device(kvm, dev);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
+}
+
+static void vgic_its_free_collection_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
+{
+	struct list_head *cur, *temp;
+
+	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list) {
+		struct its_collection *coll;
+
+		coll = list_entry(cur, struct its_collection, coll_list);
+		list_del(cur);
+		kfree(coll);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
+}
+
+
 static u64 its_cmd_mask_field(u64 *its_cmd, int word, int shift, int size)
 {
 	return (le64_to_cpu(its_cmd[word]) >> shift) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1);
@@ -1634,46 +1673,13 @@ static int vgic_its_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	return vgic_its_set_abi(its, NR_ITS_ABIS - 1);
 }
 
-static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *dev)
-{
-	struct its_ite *ite, *tmp;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(ite, tmp, &dev->itt_head, ite_list)
-		its_free_ite(kvm, ite);
-	list_del(&dev->dev_list);
-	kfree(dev);
-}
-
 static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_dev->kvm;
 	struct vgic_its *its = kvm_dev->private;
-	struct list_head *cur, *temp;
-
-	/*
-	 * We may end up here without the lists ever having been initialized.
-	 * Check this and bail out early to avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer.
-	 */
-	if (!its->device_list.next)
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
-	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->device_list) {
-		struct its_device *dev;
-
-		dev = list_entry(cur, struct its_device, dev_list);
-		vgic_its_free_device(kvm, dev);
-	}
-
-	list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &its->collection_list) {
-		struct its_collection *coll;
-
-		coll = list_entry(cur, struct its_collection, coll_list);
-		list_del(cur);
-		kfree(coll);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock);
 
+	vgic_its_free_device_list(kvm, its);
+	vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
 	kfree(its);
 }
 
-- 
2.5.5