[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYJSXH+94QScrpSPdfy8ULa6dV2q0qRjsfKAAWSRuKTKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:42:05 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO binding
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> This GPIO controller is used on UniPhier SoC family.
>
> The vendor specific property "socionext,interrupt-ranges" is for
> specifying interrupt mapping to the parent interrupt controller
> because the mapping is not contiguous. It works like "ranges",
> but transforms "interrupts" instead of "reg".
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
I don't think Rob has seen the new interrupt range thing?
(It's not a big deal. Things like these are a bit fuzzy.)
> + socionext,interrupt-ranges = <0 48 16>, <16 154 5>, <21 217 3>;
If it is as you say, that other SoCs are doing the same, we should
think about creating a generic property for this. Like
hierarchy-interrupt-ranges or so.
I kind of liked the old patch where it was just "interrupts" and
then you looked it up from the irq subsystem. (tglx even ACKed
the patch).
But I want the DT people to say something here.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists