[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df140683-63dd-02fa-f248-2fcb6d635d54@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:48:01 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
srinivas.eeda@...cle.com, joe.jin@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Call xen_cleanhighmap() with 4MB aligned for page
tables mapping
On 09/27/2017 10:33 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 27/09/17 15:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 09/27/2017 05:43 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 27/09/17 11:41, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>>> When bootup a PVM guest with large memory(Ex.240GB), XEN provided initial
>>>> mapping overlaps with kernel module virtual space. When mapping in this space
>>>> is cleared by xen_cleanhighmap(), in certain case there could be an 2MB mapping
>>>> left. This is due to XEN initialize 4MB aligned mapping but xen_cleanhighmap()
>>>> finish at 2MB boundary.
>> Does this mapping need to be 4MB-aligned?
> I guess you are questioning the alignment of addr to be 4MB?
> In this case you are right: the end of the mapping is 4MB aligned, as
> correctly stated in the comment added.
Yes, and my question is why does it need to be aligned on 4MB. Doesn't
2MB alignment suffice?
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists