lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:08:11 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
        Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] mtd: nand: atmel: Avoid ECC errors when leaving
 backup mode

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:35:51 +0200
Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com> wrote:

> During backup mode, the contents of all registers will be cleared as the
> SoC will be completely powered down. For a product that boots on NAND
> Flash memory, the bootloader will obviously use the related controller
> to read the Flash and correct any detected error in the memory, before
> handling back control to the kernel's resuming entry point.
> 
> But it does not clean the NAND controller registers after use and on its
> side the kernel driver expects the error locator to be powered down and
> in a clean state. Add a resume hook for the PMECC error locator, and
> reset its registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
> ---
> Change in v3:
> * keep the PMECC disabled when not in use, and use atmel_pmecc_resume to
>   reset the controller after the bootloader has left it enabled.
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c |  3 +++
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c           | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.h           |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
> index f25eca79f4e5..86c2199380c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
> @@ -2530,6 +2530,9 @@ static __maybe_unused int atmel_nand_controller_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct atmel_nand_controller *nc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct atmel_nand *nand;
>  
> +	if (nand->pmecc)
> +		atmel_pmecc_resume(nand->pmecc);
> +

nand is used uninitialized here, and atmel_pmecc_resume() should be
passed a atmel_pmecc object not a atmel_pmecc_user.

	if (nc->pmecc)
		atmel_pmecc_resume(nc->pmecc);

>  	list_for_each_entry(nand, &nc->chips, node) {
>  		int i;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c
> index 146af8218314..ff09c0f25dd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c
> @@ -765,6 +765,12 @@ void atmel_pmecc_get_generated_eccbytes(struct atmel_pmecc_user *user,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(atmel_pmecc_get_generated_eccbytes);
>  
> +void atmel_pmecc_reset(struct atmel_pmecc *pmecc)
> +{
> +	writel(PMECC_CTRL_RST, pmecc->regs.base + ATMEL_PMECC_CTRL);
> +	writel(PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE, pmecc->regs.base + ATMEL_PMECC_CTRL);
> +}

It's not used outside of this file, so it should have a static
specifier. Anyway, I wonder why you don't expose atmel_pmecc_reset()
directly instead of creating this atmel_pmecc_resume() wrapper.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ