[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170927151329.70011-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:13:14 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v5 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Provide support for Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV). This initial
support defines a flag that is used by the kernel to determine if it is
running with SEV active.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 6a77c63540f7..2b024741bce9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
void swiotlb_set_mem_attributes(void *vaddr, unsigned long size);
+bool sme_active(void);
+bool sev_active(void);
+
#else /* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
@@ -64,6 +67,9 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 3fcc8e01683b..5ad6ea61bd1a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ static char sme_cmdline_off[] __initdata = "off";
u64 sme_me_mask __section(.data) = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sme_me_mask);
+static bool sev_enabled;
+
/* Buffer used for early in-place encryption by BSP, no locking needed */
static char sme_early_buffer[PAGE_SIZE] __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -190,6 +192,30 @@ void __init sme_early_init(void)
protection_map[i] = pgprot_encrypted(protection_map[i]);
}
+/*
+ * SME and SEV are very similar but they are not the same, so there are
+ * times that the kernel will need to distinguish between SME and SEV. The
+ * sme_active() and sev_active() functions are used for this. When a
+ * distinction isn't needed, the mem_encrypt_active() function can be used.
+ *
+ * The trampoline code is a good example for this requirement. Before
+ * paging is activated, SME will access all memory as decrypted, but SEV
+ * will access all memory as encrypted. So, when APs are being brought
+ * up under SME the trampoline area cannot be encrypted, whereas under SEV
+ * the trampoline area must be encrypted.
+ */
+bool sme_active(void)
+{
+ return sme_me_mask && !sev_enabled;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sme_active);
+
+bool sev_active(void)
+{
+ return sme_me_mask && sev_enabled;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_active);
+
/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
index 265a9cd21cb4..b310a9c18113 100644
--- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -23,11 +23,14 @@
#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
-static inline bool sme_active(void)
+static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
{
- return !!sme_me_mask;
+ return sme_me_mask;
}
static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists