[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b023b5f4-84b5-1686-7b15-c9a3a439b8be@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 06:11:46 +0800
From: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when kernel
panic
On 9/27/17 2:59 PM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> CONFIG_SLABINFO? How does this relate to the oom info? /proc/slabinfo
>>> support is optional. Oom info could be included even if CONFIG_SLABINFO
>>> goes away. Remove the #ifdef?
>>
>> Because we want to dump the unreclaimable slab info in oom info.
>
> CONFIG_SLABINFO and /proc/slabinfo have nothing to do with the
> unreclaimable slab info.
The current design uses "struct slabinfo" and get_slabinfo() to retrieve
some info, i.e. active objs, etc. They are protected by CONFIG_SLABINFO.
We could replicate the logic in get_slabinfo without using struct
slabinfo, but it sounds not that necessary and CONFIG_SLABINFO is
typically enabled by default and it is not shown in menuconfig.
Thanks,
Yang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists