linux-kernel - [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:31:27 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup

Commit-ID:  607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d
Author:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:38 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:25:54 +0200

objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup

Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:

  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup

and

  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup

With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
pointer with:

  lea    (%rsp),%rbp

instead of:

  mov    %rsp,%rbp

The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a468af8b28a69b83fffc6d7668be9b6fcc873699.1506526584.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
index 0f22768..34a579f 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -284,11 +284,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct elf *elf, struct section *sec,
 	case 0x8d:
 		if (sib == 0x24 && rex_w && !rex_b && !rex_x) {
 
-			/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
 			*type = INSN_STACK;
-			op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+			if (!insn.displacement.value) {
+				/* lea (%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_REG;
+			} else {
+				/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+				op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
+			}
 			op->src.reg = CFI_SP;
-			op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
 			op->dest.type = OP_DEST_REG;
 			op->dest.reg = op_to_cfi_reg[modrm_reg][rex_r];