[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928004158.GA3722@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:41:58 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: calling zs_map_object() from irq is a bug
On (09/26/17 17:26), Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:39:41PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Use BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) in zs_map_object(). Calling this
> > > function from IRQ is a bug, because we use per-CPU mappings
> > > and interrupt may corrupt those buffers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> >
> > IMHO, corruption the buffer would be not enough to be a BUG_ON
> > which stop the system fully so user loses any chances to shut
> > down smooth/hunt it down.
> >
> > More serious thing of our case is that it can leak other user's
> > data by overwriting, which is more concern I am thinking now.
> >
>
> In an off-list email Linus has basically stated that all new uses of
> BUG_ON should include words in the changelog or code comments
> explaining why it is justifiable to kill the machine when the condition
> triggers.
>
> So can we please have a v2 with the appropriate comment?
ah, OK. will follow up.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists