lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:18:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Miguel Bernal Marin <miguel.bernal.marin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm]  f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:59:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> > 
> > commit: f5caf621ee357279e759c0911daf6d55c7d36f03 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for Clang")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > 
> > in testcase: trinity
> > with following parameters:
> > 
> > 	runtime: 300s
> > 
> > test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
> > test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
> > 
> > 
> > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 420M
> > 
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> > 
> > 
> > +-----------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> > |                                         | 0d0970eef3 | f5caf621ee |
> > +-----------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> > | boot_successes                          | 9          | 4          |
> > | boot_failures                           | 0          | 4          |
> > | PANIC:double_fault                      | 0          | 4          |
> > | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Machine_halted | 0          | 4          |
> > +-----------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> 
> I think a key piece of information is that the test is using GCC 4.4:
> 
>         export compiler='gcc-4.4'
> 
> ... which is pretty old compared to what gets tested typically.
> 
> GCC 4.4 was released in 2009 (!), the last minor update of 4.4.7 was 5 years ago.

Sure, but its still an officially supported GCC version. So either it
must be made to work, or we must update the minimal GCC version
requirements for the kernel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ