[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928093639.nwvohdd7h7i4htft@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:36:39 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/28] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get
segment selector
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:32:26PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> The idea is that get_overridden_seg_reg() would implement the logic you
> just described. It would return return INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT/IGNORE when
> segment override prefixes are not allowed (i.e., valid insn with
> operand rDI and string instruction; and rIP) or needed (i.e., long
> mode, except if there are override prefixes for FS or GS); or
> INAT_SEG_REG_[CSDEFG]S otherwise.
Ok, lemme see if we're talking the same thing. Your diff is linewrapped
so parsing that is hard.
Do this
if (regoff == offsetof(struct pt_regs, ip)) {
if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
return INAT_SEG_REG_IGNORE;
else
return INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT;
}
and all the other checking *before* you do insn_init(). Because you have
crazy stuff like:
if (seg_reg == INAT_SEG_REG_IGNORE)
return seg_reg;
which shortcuts those functions and is simply clumsy and complicates
following the code. The mere fact that you have to call the function
"get_overridden_seg_reg_if_any_or_needed()" already tells you that that
function is doing too many things at once.
When the function is called get_segment_register() then it should do
only that. And all the checking is done before or in wrappers.
IOW, all the rIP checking and early return down the
insn_get_seg_base() -> resolve_seg_register() -> .. should be done
separately.
*Then* you do insn_init() and hand it down to insn_get_seg_base() and
from now on you have a proper insn pointer which you hand around and
check for NULL only once, on function entry.
Then your code flow is much simpler: first you take care of the case
where rIP doesn't do segment overrides and all the other cases are
handled by the normal path, with a proper struct insn.
Makes more sense?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists