linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/aux: Only update aux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:29:15 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/aux: Only update aux_wakeup in non-overwrite mode

Hi Alexander,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:34:03PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:08:11PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> Commit d9a50b0256 ("perf/aux: Ensure aux_wakeup represents most recent
> >> wakeup index") changed aux wakeup position calculation to rounddown(),
> >> which causes a division-by-zero in AUX overwrite mode (aka "snapshot
> >> mode").
> >> 
> >> The zero denominator results from the fact that perf record doesn't set
> >> aux_watermark to anything, in which case the kernel will set it to half
> >> the AUX buffer size, but only for non-overwrite mode. In the overwrite
> >> mode aux_watermark stays zero.
> >> 
> >> The good news is that, AUX overwrite mode, wakeups don't happen and
> >> related bookkeeping is not relevant, so we can simply forego the whole
> >> wakeup updates.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > Damn, sorry about that. How did you spot the problem?
> 
> A normal perf record with -S should trigger it, I don't remember what
> exactly I was doing at that moment. But no worries, we all missed it the
> first time around. :)
> 
> > Anyway, I think the code is much better with this factored out:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> Thanks!

What's the status on this patch? I don't see it in mainline or linux-next,
but it would ideally get in as a fix for 4.14.

Will