[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928124836.kdqjowqibab53hf5@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:48:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
arnd@...db.de, stuyoder@...il.com, roy.pledge@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de,
bogdan.purcareata@....com, laurentiu.tudor@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:57:28PM -0500, Ioana Radulescu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> index f809682..26922fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline struct dpaa2_io *service_select_by_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d,
> if (d)
> return d;
>
> - if (unlikely(cpu >= num_possible_cpus()))
> + if (unlikely(cpu >= (int)num_possible_cpus()))
Drivers shouldn't use likely/unlikley. Please write it more explicitly
like this:
if (cpu != -1 && cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
return NULL;
Same for the other one as well.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists