[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26d68681-a157-26d3-84cb-6684dcaf3135@chelsio.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:08:21 +0530
From: Harsh Jain <Harsh@...lsio.com>
To: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Michael Werner <werner@...lsio.com>, "nd@....com" <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: DMA error when sg->offset value is greater than PAGE_SIZE in
Intel IOMMU
On 28-09-2017 02:59, Casey Leedom wrote:
> Hey Raj,
>
> Let us know if you need help in gathering more debugging information. For
> the time being we've decided to ERRATA the use of the Intel I/O MMU with
> IPsec till we Root Cause the issue. But this is still at the top of Harsh's
> bug list.
>
> With Robin's comments, I'm almost sure that the:
>
> (iov_pfn + sg->offset) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> in your suggested patch is an issue. iov_pfn is a Page Frame Number and
> sg->offset is a Byte Offset. It feels like this should be:
>
> size_t page_off = sg->offset & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
> unsigned long pfn_off = sg->offset >> VTD_PAGE_MASK;
> ...
> sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)
> (iov_pfn + pfn_off) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + page_off;
>
> When Harsh tried your original patch, Harsh' test system wouldn't even boot.
Today I tried with "Intel_iommu=sp_off" boot option. Traffic runs without any error for more than 1 hrs. What magic this option did? :)
>
> Casey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists