lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:10:33 -0500
From:   Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>
To:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, <agraf@...e.de>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <bogdan.purcareata@....com>, <stuyoder@...il.com>,
        <laurentiu.tudor@....com>, <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
        <roy.pledge@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison

For some dpio functions, a cpu id parameter value of -1 is
valid and means "any". But when trying to validate this param
value against an upper limit, in this case num_possible_cpus(),
we risk obtaining the wrong result due to an implicit cast.

Avoid an incorrect check result by explicitly comparing the
cpu id with the "any" value before verifying the upper bound.

Signed-off-by: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>
---
v2:
 - make condition more clear (as suggested by Dan Carpenter)
 - don't use unlikely()

 drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/dpaa2-io.h      | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
index f809682..a609ec8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline struct dpaa2_io *service_select_by_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d,
 	if (d)
 		return d;
 
-	if (unlikely(cpu >= num_possible_cpus()))
+	if (cpu != DPAA2_IO_ANY_CPU && cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
 		return NULL;
 
 	/*
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct dpaa2_io *dpaa2_io_create(const struct dpaa2_io_desc *desc)
 		return NULL;
 
 	/* check if CPU is out of range (-1 means any cpu) */
-	if (desc->cpu >= num_possible_cpus()) {
+	if (desc->cpu != DPAA2_IO_ANY_CPU && desc->cpu >= num_possible_cpus()) {
 		kfree(obj);
 		return NULL;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/dpaa2-io.h b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/dpaa2-io.h
index c564609..afc2d06 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/dpaa2-io.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/dpaa2-io.h
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ struct device;
  * for dequeue.
  */
 
+#define DPAA2_IO_ANY_CPU	-1
+
 /**
  * struct dpaa2_io_desc - The DPIO descriptor
  * @receives_notifications: Use notificaton mode. Non-zero if the DPIO
@@ -91,8 +93,8 @@ irqreturn_t dpaa2_io_irq(struct dpaa2_io *obj);
  * @cb:           The callback to be invoked when the notification arrives
  * @is_cdan:      Zero for FQDAN, non-zero for CDAN
  * @id:           FQID or channel ID, needed for rearm
- * @desired_cpu:  The cpu on which the notifications will show up. -1 means
- *                any CPU.
+ * @desired_cpu:  The cpu on which the notifications will show up. Use
+ *                DPAA2_IO_ANY_CPU if don't care
  * @dpio_id:      The dpio index
  * @qman64:       The 64-bit context value shows up in the FQDAN/CDAN.
  * @node:         The list node
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ