[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bbeefd2-a409-168c-b596-bcaa29a54eb7@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:12:19 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@...co.com>, benve@...co.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jlbec@...lplan.org, hch@....de,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pci: introduce __pci_walk_bus for caller with
pci_bus_sem held
On 9/27/2017 5:42 PM, Govindarajulu Varadarajan wrote:
> +void __pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> + void *userdata);
pci_walk_bus_locked would be a better name as you are assuming that caller is
holding the lock.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists