[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871smqhh9z.fsf@anholt.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:20:08 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/vc4: Move the DSI clock divider workaround closer to the clock call.
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:36:52PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> We want the adjusted_mode->clock to be the actual clock we're
>> expecting to program, so that consumers see the right values for clock
>> and vrefresh.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Do you want me to apply this to drm-misc-next along with the touchscreen
> panel driver?
drm-misc-next procedure trends toward the submitter applies the patch
once they get review, if they have the commit rights. However, I'm
happy either way as long as I can get the code in.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists