[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k20izjcw.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:57:51 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Erik Hons <erik.hons@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 3/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for GPIO configuration
Hi Brandon,
>> Would there be any value in implementing a proper gpiochip structure
>> here such that other pieces of SW can see this GPIO controller as a
>> provider and you can reference it from e.g: Device Tree using GPIO
>> descriptors?
>
> That would be my preference as well, or maybe a pinctrl driver.
Indeed seeing a gpio_chip or a pinctrl controller registered from a
gpio.c or pinctrl.c file in a separate patchset would be great.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists