[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928223719.GY15970@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:37:19 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix legacy IRQ assignment execution stage
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:37:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Through struct pci_host_bridge->{map/swizzle}_irq() hooks is now
> possible to define IRQ mapping functions on a per PCI host bridge basis.
>
> Actual IRQ allocation is carried out by the pci_assign_irq() function in
> pci_device_probe() - to make sure a device is assigned an IRQ only if it
> is probed (ie match a driver); it retrieves a struct pci_host_bridge*
> for a given PCI device and through {map/swizzle}_irq() hooks it carries
> out the PCI IRQ allocation.
>
> As it turned out, some legacy drivers (eg IDE layer) require that a
> device allocates IRQ as soon as it is added so that its actual IRQ
> settings are available early in the boot process. With current code
> calling pci_assign_irq() in pci_device_probe() IDE IRQ probing fails
> for some drivers:
I think the patch is fine, but I don't understand the changelog. I
want to know specifically what the dependency on dev->irq is. "Early
in the boot process" is pretty vague.
I *thought* we were doing something like this:
pci_device_probe(dev1)
pci_assign_irq(dev1)
...
ide_pci_init_two(dev1, dev2, ...)
do_ide_setup_pci_device(dev1)
pciirq = dev1->irq # this one is fine
do_ide_setup_pci_device(dev2)
pciirq = dev2->irq # not fine
where the problem is that we haven't called pci_assign_irq(dev2), so
dev2->irq hasn't been set.
But that doesn't match the data because we should be coming through
cmd64x_init_one(), which calls ide_pci_init_one(), so we shouldn't
have a dev2 in this path.
> ide0: disabled, no IRQ
> ide0: failed to initialize IDE interface
> ide0: disabling port
> cmd64x 0000:00:02.0: IDE controller (0x1095:0x0646 rev 0x07)
> CMD64x_IDE 0000:00:02.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [io 0x8050-0x8057]
> cmd64x 0000:00:02.0: can't reserve resources
> CMD64x_IDE: probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -16
> ide_generic: please use "probe_mask=0x3f" module parameter for probing
> all legacy ISA IDE ports
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x94/0xd0
> sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/ide_port/ide0'
> ...
>
> Trace:
> [<fffffc00003308a0>] __warn+0x160/0x190
> [<fffffc000048c9f4>] sysfs_warn_dup+0x94/0xd0
> [<fffffc0000330928>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x58/0x70
> [<fffffc000048c9f4>] sysfs_warn_dup+0x94/0xd0
> [<fffffc0000486d40>] kernfs_path_from_node+0x30/0x60
> [<fffffc00004874ac>] kernfs_put+0x16c/0x2c0
> [<fffffc00004874ac>] kernfs_put+0x16c/0x2c0
> [<fffffc000048d010>] sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0x100/0x120
> [<fffffc00005b9d64>] device_add+0x2a4/0x7c0
> [<fffffc00005ba5cc>] device_create_groups_vargs+0x14c/0x170
> [<fffffc00005ba518>] device_create_groups_vargs+0x98/0x170
> [<fffffc00005ba690>] device_create+0x50/0x70
> [<fffffc00005df36c>] ide_host_register+0x48c/0xa00
> [<fffffc00005df330>] ide_host_register+0x450/0xa00
> [<fffffc00005ba2a0>] device_register+0x20/0x50
> [<fffffc00005df330>] ide_host_register+0x450/0xa00
> [<fffffc00005df944>] ide_host_add+0x64/0xe0
> [<fffffc000079b41c>] kobject_uevent_env+0x16c/0x710
> [<fffffc0000310288>] do_one_initcall+0x68/0x260
> [<fffffc00007b13bc>] kernel_init+0x1c/0x1a0
> [<fffffc00007b13a0>] kernel_init+0x0/0x1a0
> [<fffffc0000311868>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x18/0x20
> [<fffffc00007b13a0>] kernel_init+0x0/0x1a0
>
> ---[ end trace 24a70433c3e4d374 ]---
> ide0: disabling port
>
> Fix the IRQ allocation issue by moving the pci_assign_irq() call from
> pci_device_probe() to pci_device_add(), so that IRQs for a given PCI
> device are allocated as soon as it is scanned by the PCI enumeration.
>
> This has the drawback of allocating an IRQ even for PCI devices that
> do not have a matching kernel driver but it should be safe to carry
> out in all configurations.
>
> Fixes: 30fdfb929e82 ("PCI: Add a call to pci_assign_irq() in
> pci_device_probe()")
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/32ec730f-c1b0-5584-cd35-f8a809122b96@roeck-us.net
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 --
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 11bd267..750d688 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -415,8 +415,6 @@ static int pci_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> struct pci_driver *drv = to_pci_driver(dev->driver);
>
> - pci_assign_irq(pci_dev);
> -
> error = pcibios_alloc_irq(pci_dev);
> if (error < 0)
> return error;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index ff94b69..ba4e466 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2103,6 +2103,9 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> /* Initialize various capabilities */
> pci_init_capabilities(dev);
>
> + /* Assign device IRQ number */
Pointless comment (as is the existing capabilities one above).
> + pci_assign_irq(dev);
> +
> /*
> * Add the device to our list of discovered devices
> * and the bus list for fixup functions, etc.
> --
> 2.4.12
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists