[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.1709281624330.24635@cae-iprp-alln-lb.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:46:23 -0700
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@...co.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
CC: <benve@...co.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jlbec@...lplan.org>, <hch@....de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pci aer: fix deadlock in do_recovery
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/27/2017 5:42 PM, Govindarajulu Varadarajan wrote:
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> __driver_attach()
>> device_lock(&dev->mutex) <--- device mutex lock here
>> driver_probe_device()
>> pci_enable_sriov()
>> pci_iov_add_virtfn()
>> pci_device_add()
>> aer_isr() <--- pci aer error
>> do_recovery()
>> broadcast_error_message()
>> pci_walk_bus()
>> down_read(&pci_bus_sem) <--- rd sem
>
> How about releasing the device_lock here on CPU0?>
pci_device_add() is called by driver's pci probe function. device_lock(dev)
should be held before calling pci driver probe function.
> or in other words keep device_lock as short as possible?
The problem is not the duration device_lock is held. It is the order two locks
are aquired. We cannot control or implement a restriction that during
device_lock() is held, driver probe should not call pci function which aquires
pci_bus_sem. And in case of pci aer, aer handler needs to call driver err_handler()
for which we need to hold device_lock() before calling err_handler(). In order
to find all the devices on a pci bus, we should hold pci_bus_sem to do
pci_walk_bus().
>> down_write(&pci_bus_sem) <-- stuck on wr sem
>> report_error_detected()
>> device_lock(&dev->mutex)<--- DEAD LOCK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists