lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929113853.7voni73crg6hfvjx@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:38:53 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        josef@...icpanda.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, efault@....de, pjt@...gle.com,
        clm@...com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com,
        yuyang.du@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 03/18] sched/fair: Cure calc_cfs_shares() vs
 reweight_entity()

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:

> > -	load = scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight);
> > +	load = max(scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight), cfs_rq->avg.load_avg);
> 
> We use cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib (the filtered version of
> cfs_rq->avg.load_avg) instead of cfs_rq->avg.load_avg further down, so I
> think we should here too for consistency.
> 
> +	load = max(scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight),
> +		   cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib);
> 

No; we must use tg_load_avg_contrib because that is what's inclded in
tg_weight, but we want to add the most up-to-date value back in.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ