[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929115016.pzlqc7ss3ccystyg@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:50:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, markus@...ppelsdorf.de, tj@...nel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:01:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:07:48 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > +static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state)
> > +{
> > + static const char state_char[] = "RSDTtXZ";
> > +
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + ilog2(TASK_REPORT) != sizeof(state_char) - 2);
> >
> > - return state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?';
> > + return state_char[state];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +{
> > + return __task_state_to_char(__get_task_state(tsk));
> > }
> >
>
> So far I'm fine with the patch set, but I hate the non descriptive "__"
> prefix of __task_state_to_char(). Can we make this a bit more
> descriptive, because every time I see it in other patches, I go back to
> this patch to see if we are using the right function.
>
> What about something like:
>
> task_state_to_state_char(unsigned int state);
>
> task_to_state_char(struct task_struct *tsk);
>
> ?
Hurmph.. naming.
How about something like so?
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static const char * const task_state_arr
static inline const char *get_task_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + ilog2(TASK_REPORT_MAX) != ARRAY_SIZE(task_state_array));
- return task_state_array[__get_task_state(tsk)];
+ return task_state_array[task_state_index(tsk)];
}
static inline int get_task_umask(struct task_struct *tsk)
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct
#define TASK_REPORT_IDLE (TASK_REPORT + 1)
#define TASK_REPORT_MAX (TASK_REPORT_IDLE << 1)
-static inline unsigned int __get_task_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline unsigned int task_state_index(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
unsigned int tsk_state = READ_ONCE(tsk->state);
unsigned int state = (tsk_state | tsk->exit_state) & TASK_REPORT;
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __get_task_st
return fls(state);
}
-static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state)
+static inline char task_index_to_char(unsigned int state)
{
static const char state_char[] = "RSDTtXZPI";
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ static inline char __task_state_to_char(
static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- return __task_state_to_char(__get_task_state(tsk));
+ return task_index_to_char(task_state_index(tsk));
}
/**
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline long __trace_sched_switch_
if (preempt)
return TASK_STATE_MAX;
- return __get_task_state(p);
+ return task_state_index(p);
}
#endif /* CREATE_TRACE_POINTS */
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_ctxwake_p
trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
- T = __task_state_to_char(field->next_state);
- S = __task_state_to_char(field->prev_state);
+ T = task_index_to_char(field->next_state);
+ S = task_index_to_char(field->prev_state);
trace_find_cmdline(field->next_pid, comm);
trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq,
" %5d:%3d:%c %s [%03d] %5d:%3d:%c %s\n",
@@ -957,8 +957,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_raw(struct trac
trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
if (!S)
- S = __task_state_to_char(field->prev_state);
- T = __task_state_to_char(field->next_state);
+ S = task_index_to_char(field->prev_state);
+ T = task_index_to_char(field->next_state);
trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "%d %d %c %d %d %d %c\n",
field->prev_pid,
field->prev_prio,
@@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_hex(struct trac
trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
if (!S)
- S = __task_state_to_char(field->prev_state);
- T = __task_state_to_char(field->next_state);
+ S = task_index_to_char(field->prev_state);
+ T = task_index_to_char(field->next_state);
SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD(s, field->prev_pid);
SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD(s, field->prev_prio);
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -397,10 +397,10 @@ tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_
entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
entry->prev_pid = prev->pid;
entry->prev_prio = prev->prio;
- entry->prev_state = __get_task_state(prev);
+ entry->prev_state = task_state_index(prev);
entry->next_pid = next->pid;
entry->next_prio = next->prio;
- entry->next_state = __get_task_state(next);
+ entry->next_state = task_state_index(next);
entry->next_cpu = task_cpu(next);
if (!call_filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_
entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
entry->prev_pid = curr->pid;
entry->prev_prio = curr->prio;
- entry->prev_state = __get_task_state(curr);
+ entry->prev_state = task_state_index(curr);
entry->next_pid = wakee->pid;
entry->next_prio = wakee->prio;
- entry->next_state = __get_task_state(wakee);
+ entry->next_state = task_state_index(wakee);
entry->next_cpu = task_cpu(wakee);
if (!call_filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists