[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68c18868-99c5-20e0-d65e-6ad1afdedde5@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:40:49 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/22] firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain
support using genpd
On 28/09/17 22:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 28 September 2017 at 15:11, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>> This patch hooks up the support for device power domain provided by
>> SCMI using the Linux generic power domain infrastructure.
>>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 13 +++
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/scmi_pm_domain.c
>>
[...]
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++, scmi_pd++) {
>> + domains[i] = &scmi_pd->genpd;
>> +
>> + scmi_pd->domain = i;
>> + scmi_pd->handle = handle;
>> + scmi_pd->name = handle->power_ops->name_get(handle, i);
>> + scmi_pd->genpd.name = scmi_pd->name;
>> + scmi_pd->genpd.power_off = scmi_pd_power_off;
>> + scmi_pd->genpd.power_on = scmi_pd_power_on;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Treat all power domains as off at boot.
>> + *
>> + * The SCP firmware itself may have switched on some domains,
>> + * but for reference counting purpose, keep it this way.
>> + */
>
> I think it would be better to give the correct information about the
> state of the PM domain. Otherwise genpd may end up thinking a PM
> domain is off, while in fact it's on - thus wasting power.
>
Agreed, I missed to notice that. I will fixup and send the update.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists