[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASiker+1_uHXyhdkSJVMCX-TwXLhxD_ibQFLXWR9u0p6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 23:33:28 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mtd: nand: wait for tWHR, and fix the
setup_data_interface of Denali
(+CC Marc Gonzalez)
2017-09-29 21:26 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:38:38 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> 1/2 : add NAND_WAIT_TWHR and nand_whr_delay().
>> You can set this new flag if you want nand_command(_lp)
>> to insert tWHR delay where needed.
>>
>> 2/2 : Fix Denali setup_data_interface.
>> Boris' suggestion in v1 was a good reminder that
>> made me realize tCCS was missing in the driver. Fix it now.
>>
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Add nand_whr_delay() helper
>> Wait for tWHR only for drivers that explicitly set NAND_WAIT_TWHR flag
>> - newly added
>>
>> Masahiro Yamada (2):
>> mtd: nand: wait for tWHR after NAND_CMD_STATUS / NAND_CMD_READID
>
> Hm, I thought you were introducing this to then use it in the denali
> driver. Sorry, but I don't want to apply something that nobody needs.
> If someone ever complains about a missing delay I'll point him to your
> patch, but until then I'll keep the core unchanged.
Perhaps, Marc Gonzalez is the person.
tango_nand.c is the only driver that sets NAND_WAIT_TCCS.
Now, there is completely no delay when reading out the ID.
One safe change might be apply this patch,
then set NAND_WAIT_TWHR to tango_nand.c
I am guessing NAND_WAIT_TCCS was added for it.
Theoretically, I do not see logical difference between tCCS and tWHR.
I am CCing Marc Gonzalez, the author of tango_nand.c
commit 6ea40a3ba93e1b14ffb349e276f9dfefc4334b99
Author: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Date: Sat Oct 1 10:24:03 2016 +0200
mtd: nand: Wait tCCS after a column change
Drivers implementing ->cmd_ctrl() and relying on the default ->cmdfunc()
implementation usually don't wait tCCS when a column change (RNDIN or
RNDOUT) is requested.
Add an option flag to ask the core to do so (note that we keep this as
an opt-in to avoid breaking existing implementations), and make use of
the ->data_interface information is available (otherwise, wait 500ns).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists