lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929165154.4vj752lk4i7hp3v2@pd.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:51:54 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Disable branch profiling in mem_encrypt.c

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:24:19AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Some routines in mem_encrypt.c are called very early in the boot process,
> e.g. sme_encrypt_kernel(). When CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING is defined
> the resulting branch profiling associated with the check to see if SME is
> active results in a kernel crash. Disable branch profiling for
> mem_encrypt.c by defining DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING before including any
> header files.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> index 3fcc8e0..16c5f37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>   */
>  
> +#define DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> +
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ