[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1506717436.3240277.1122909192.402C1E9C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:07:16 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
bradleyb@...ziesquirrel.com, jk@...abs.org,
cbostic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, joel@....id.au,
"Edward A. James" <eajames@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] drivers: fsi: Add SBEFIFO FSI client device driver
Hi Eddie,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, at 06:35, Eddie James wrote:
> From: "Edward A. James" <eajames@...ibm.com>
>
> IBM POWER9 processors contain some embedded hardware and software bits
> collectively referred to as the self boot engine (SBE). One role of
> the SBE is to act as a proxy that provides access to the registers of
> the POWER chip from other (embedded) systems.
>
> The POWER9 chip contains a hardware frontend for communicating with
> the SBE from remote systems called the SBEFIFO. The SBEFIFO logic
> is contained within an FSI CFAM and as such the driver implements an
> FSI bus device.
>
> The SBE expects to communicate using a defined wire protocol; however,
> the driver knows nothing of the protocol and only provides raw access
> to the fifo device to userspace applications wishing to communicate with
> the SBE using the wire protocol.
>
> The SBEFIFO consists of two hardware fifos. The upstream fifo is used
> by the driver to transfer data to the SBE on the POWER chip, from the
> system hosting the driver. The downstream fifo is used by the driver to
> transfer data from the SBE on the power chip to the system hosting the
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@...ziesquirrel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Edward A. James <eajames@...ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/fsi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 861
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 869 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
My general feeling is the implementation is too complex by half for what
is required. I may be wrong and the solution genuinely needs the
complexity, but to test that I'll cook up a counter-proposal patch and
we can debate that. I'm away for the next few days, but I hope to send
something by the end of next week.
Cheers,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists