[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929055939.39937-2-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:59:36 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] f2fs: drop FI_UPDATE_WRITE tag after f2fs_issue_flush
If we failed to issue flush in ->fsync, we need to keep FI_UPDATE_WRITE
flag to make sure triggering flush in next ->fsync.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 224379a9848c..18ca8b305699 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -294,10 +294,12 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
remove_ino_entry(sbi, ino, APPEND_INO);
clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_APPEND_WRITE);
flush_out:
- remove_ino_entry(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO);
- clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
if (!atomic)
ret = f2fs_issue_flush(sbi);
+ if (!ret) {
+ remove_ino_entry(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO);
+ clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
+ }
f2fs_update_time(sbi, REQ_TIME);
out:
trace_f2fs_sync_file_exit(inode, need_cp, datasync, ret);
--
2.13.1.388.g69e6b9b4f4a9
Powered by blists - more mailing lists