[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hk20fexgy.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:35:25 +0200
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] pinctrl: meson: clean pin offsets
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> writes:
> The initial goal of this series was move to TEST_N pin from the EE
> controller to AO controller, where it belongs. This meant modify the
> EE_OFF value.
>
> This offset is a quirk we brought from the vendor driver when it was
> initially merged. There no reason to keep this around and we could simply
> let pinctrl figure the pin base value.
>
> Removing this offset, while simple, ends up being quite a patch bomb.
> This is why I split the change over 5 first patches, so the important
> change, patch #1 remains visible. Of course, to avoid breaking bisect,
> these first 5 patches should be squashed into one. (If you prefer that I
> squash it myself, I may have to send you a PR as the patch would exceed
> VGER 100000 characters limit)
>
> The last change is this series, while not directly related, also requires
> to adjust the gpio-line-names property in DT. Having these changes going
> together would make it easier to coordinate the DTS changes.
>
> This was changeset has been test on gxbb P200, gxl libretech-cc. It was
> also boot tested on meson8 (Thx Martin!)
Really nice cleanup, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists