[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171001102647.GA23908@amd>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 12:26:47 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp
Subject: Re: 4.14-rc2 on thinkpad x220: out of memory when inserting mmc card
Hi!
> I inserted u-SD card, only to realize that it is not detected as it
> should be. And dmesg indeed reveals:
Tetsuo asked me to report this to linux-mm.
But 2^4 is 16 pages, IIRC that can't be expected to work reliably, and
thus this sounds like MMC bug, not mm bug.
> [10994.299846] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address 0003
> [10994.302196] kworker/2:1: page allocation failure: order:4,
> mode:0x16040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOTRACK), nodemask=(null)
> [10994.302212] CPU: 2 PID: 9500 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted
> 4.14.0-rc2 #135
> [10994.302215] Hardware name: LENOVO 42872WU/42872WU, BIOS 8DET73WW
> (1.43 ) 10/12/2016
> [10994.302222] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan
> [10994.302227] Call Trace:
> [10994.302233] dump_stack+0x4d/0x67
> [10994.302239] warn_alloc+0xde/0x180
> [10994.302243] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xaa4/0xd30
> [10994.302249] ? cache_alloc_refill+0xb73/0xc10
> [10994.302252] cache_alloc_refill+0x101/0xc10
> [10994.302258] ? mmc_init_request+0x2d/0xd0
> [10994.302262] ? mmc_init_request+0x2d/0xd0
> [10994.302265] __kmalloc+0xaf/0xe0
> [10994.302269] mmc_init_request+0x2d/0xd0
> [10994.302273] alloc_request_size+0x45/0x60
> [10994.302276] ? free_request_size+0x30/0x30
> [10994.302280] mempool_create_node+0xd7/0x130
> [10994.302283] ? alloc_request_simple+0x20/0x20
> [10994.302287] blk_init_rl+0xe8/0x110
> [10994.302290] blk_init_allocated_queue+0x70/0x180
> [10994.302294] mmc_init_queue+0xdd/0x370
> [10994.302297] mmc_blk_alloc_req+0xf6/0x340
> [10994.302301] mmc_blk_probe+0x18b/0x4e0
> [10994.302305] mmc_bus_probe+0x12/0x20
> [10994.302309] driver_probe_device+0x2f4/0x490
>
> Order 4 allocations are not supposed to be reliable...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists