lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1506933302.25065.3.camel@au1.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:35:02 +0200
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>
To:     Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc:     ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernv: Add OCC driver to mmap sensor area

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 14:14 +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > This driver provides interface to mmap the OCC sensor area
> > to userspace to parse and read OCC inband sensors.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Is this for debug? If so, the existing exports interface should be used.
> 
> If there's actual sensors, we already have two ways of exposing sensors
> to Linux: the OPAL_SENSOR API and the IMC API.
> 
> Why this method and not use the existing ones?

More than that, a sensor should be exposed to userspace via hwmon, not
some random direct userspace map.

Ben.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ