[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0Zi9B69Yhg9H8UqfnA5RHHk1RrGvx757ejwJcAupf1cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 11:02:19 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-media @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev @ googlegroups . com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kbuild @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string.h: work around for increased stack usage
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> void fortify_panic(const char *name) __noreturn __cold;
> +
> +/* work around GCC PR82365 */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN) && !defined(__clang__) && GCC_VERSION <= 80000
> +#define fortify_panic(x) \
> + do { \
> + asm volatile(""); \
> + fortify_panic(x); \
> + } while (0)
> +#endif
This broke the build for the fortify_panic() definition in lib/string.c which
clashes with the macro. I've fixed it locally by renaming it to __fortify_panic,
but won't post the fixed version until I get some feedback on the basic
approach.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists